Confession: No pun intended.

 In regards to the Tetrahedron of Everything, I may need to give credit to Ken Wilber.  While I was not aware of it at the time, and I had recovered it base on earlier work of mine(i.e. a reading of Plato’s Republic), I may need to give him credit for it.  Even to the point of unconsciously stealing it lock, stock and barrel.  Alternatively it is a case of synchronicity* but it turns out, he had a late night radio program from 1973 to 1982 about such “new age” matters.  This coincides with a period I worked mostly graveyard shifts and had access to a radio.  I recovered this not only through Plato other fields of study.  Only thanks to a  question to Meta AI did I discover that he had the same disciplines on the vertices of the tetrahedron.  They are Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.  HOWEVER: while this has not been run through AI even for cleanup, in a quick search I could not find the sources for what AI had given me on another device.    

A more comprehensive search (who came up with the Tetrahedron of Everything Physics, Psychology, Philosophy and Politics.) does not find what I have on my other device either.  But it does remind me to credit Buckminster Fuller who I saw speak at our high school in the early 70’s. Then there is Milo Wolfe who I can not place on the timeline of this process.  More credit to be processed.

https://youtu.be/bc5V_YXvGC8   This has not been viewed yet, but shows four people I have studied.  Three of them in one class.  “Marx, Nietzsche, Freud” and Einstein an early publication.  Sometime in the early 70’s I read the book, Man and his Symbols by Joseph Campbell, with a forward by Carl Jung.

* Update: I have found that Wilbur had not mentioned it until his book in 1995. Which I did not read or have.

5-9-26  However Arthur Youg mentioned a Tetrahedron of Will in 1976>

Tetrahedral log: Page One

 Page One https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/09/this-will-start-with-backlog-of.html

Stumbled upon*:    My response to Terrence Howard. 

By Neil deGrasse Tyson

https://youtu.be/1uLi1I3G2N4?si=FCWNGUTmmB6fkEoY

Pardon my neglect in maintaining my skills in blog construction.  Hopefully it is needless to say that I agree with Neil deGrasse Tyson and appreciate his perspective, intelligence and patience in addressing the piece submitted to him.   I would certainly be happy if I had such input.  Not that I have made any clear claims that may be disputed or tested.  **

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/10/tetrahedron-ramble.html

Post under construction:

Tetrahedron Model 

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=Tetrahedron

Bingo!  I must credit a partial reading of The Republic, by Plato and my report on it which involved a tetrahedral pillar.  This is my theory of everything ...of sorts.

https://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2002/07/ie-se-vi-edgy.html

* used before finding out a site by that name existed

** I use a semi-conscious and semi-scientific method[!]

[!] : indicates or punctuates play of words or intended pun.

Nixon to China?*

*see blogsearch box

It was a foreign policy trope.  Hmm.  I guess I was right...at least in the word "trope".   In double checking my use of the word, I addressed my project* in one way.  I have yet tor read the link under the "word", but it was found within a google of "Nixon to China" and suggests "Trump to North Korea" which is one answer to my slightly facetious** search.

Now that I have expanded the geometry or loopiness of the subject, another one just may be "Trump to tropes."  In an earlier pondering of this project, I thought of "Trump to the red line."  Today I really was recognizing the difficulty in this effort, as in the Trump will set you free.

Here is another project.

*Note the 3(now4) locations of my asterisks

** This word is attempting to take the edge off a very serious matter; finding a parallel trope for Trump.  (Ironically it just might be "Trump to Trump.")

List of Trump to tropes[!]
Trump to Nixon?


[!]= sic punctuation

More on the geometrics of everything.

A. but in no particular order or to be arranged later...there is the tetrahedron of will as I reconstructed a platonic book report.
B.  My reference to math being next to Godliness.
C.  the deconstruction of a famous formula into x,y,z & t
D ...may the cable guy be with you or hoist on our own Picard.
Enough charting of points, here is an article that may be relative.

Some prospecting.  Math, geometry and theories are all constructs.  Uniting constructs is problematic.
I have a hunch that some of them are the problem as much as the key.

PS.  I had not even gotten into the piece maybe as far as locality and unitarity, let alone "constructs."

ahhhh..."Rube Goldberg" that's the ticket[!]
or Rubrics Cube or tetrahedron.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

~the problem of one and infinities and paradoxes

~~~a problem with the tetrahedron of will in my physics, psychology, philosophy and politics...
see "bundles of tetrahedrons" and a different rendering.

image credit
Pardon the live-blogging/reading but I better get some zzz's.
bookmark Quest for Quantum Gravity or the Jinga of time and space.

Bookmark

What is the point?
A temp late [!] ( to view later.)
Related charge:
Consciousness
Value of information.

Linguistic turn
Mind outside
???  Not exactly
They say time is the 4th dimension, not that is only one dimention[!]
What about perspective?  Or perpendicular?
My point at this time is that I believe I developed my template of the tetrahedron before running into Arthur Young.  And I am only now in the process of watching his seminar on process theory.i do know I must credit Plato for an earlier model (based on The Republic) which I revamped with the help of Einstein's famous equation and geometry.   (X,Y,Z & P). P for perpendicular and perspective(only now so designated) let alone Plato's ideal or the point.

At least two of these

are relevant to recent reads and one confirms a suspicion of mine in reaction to a read.
Now the task is to re-view it.

Footnotes Page One May 2016

Nominalism:  5-30-16
Peter Abelard*: (b.s.) a. Too Random..., b. Literally, c.  In the Beginning,  d. GOT ED!
Theodicy: NFRY

*"Hence, Abelard concludes, universality is not an ontological feature of the world but a semantic feature of language."

Filed to Read.

Minimum Wage Resources

http://www.epi.org/publication/importance-study-design-minimum-wage-debate/

http://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/inequality/the-effects-of-raising-the-minimum-wage



http://www.nber.org/papers/w12663.pdf?new_window=1

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/44995

http://americanactionforum.org/insights/what-the-weight-of-minimum-wage-research-shows

https://www.facebook.com/eddiegilchrist/posts/10208542946436436

https://www.facebook.com/raiseourwage/photos/a.1676792199227347.1073741828.1672542002985700/1681523792087521/?type=3&theater

http://evonomics.com/no-one-knows-why-trump-is-winning/



http://evonomics.com/economist-debunks-one-of-the-biggest-myths-about-governments/
http://evonomics.com/apes-make-irrational-economic-decisions-that-includes-you/

http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/what-wrecked-scotus-nominations-623482435586
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/02/rachel-maddow-breaks-down-how-badly-the-us-needs-a-full-supreme-court-going-into-the-election/

Tetrahedron of Will.

Geometrics of Politics
With one euphemism tied behind my metaphors...the physics of pull.

{Tangent shall file ... }

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1)

De~men~shun~alism[!]

Bohemian gravity!

Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, ,  Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,

Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?

* compactified?

The catch may be in the fold.  The pun is in the journalism.  The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics.  The point is: what is a dimension?  Not to mention: what is a point?  A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective.  A point has no dimension.  Two points represent 1 dimension or a line.   Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions.  Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space.  But dimensions are one level below the point. 

Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension.  But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).

1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}

Black Lives Matter

Hillary
Bernie

Trump
no trump ?*

file this **

*the Summer of Trump
** Amazon Culture

8-18-15:  GPST
Donald Trump geometers like a third grader. (^)

Speaking of Self-tense.  OW: Geo-Political Self Tents?
Sub-reference:  Putting perspective in one's own frame. 

Not to take my own tangent, but Hillary and Bernie are under pressure from many angles to craft their message so that it matters to the perspective of their critics.  Nothing should take away from the words in this heading.  Trump is another case of geometry at work***, formerly known as triangulation of the third way. 

Back to what matters!?  Do they feel the Bern?  The operable "they" being the parties and campaigns, it is good exercise, or in some cases exorcise.

*** culture at work? (see: file this / bridging the law of intended consequences?) **
[Tea Party / Trump Party? 50 state scream? Why is there no Colbert of the Right?]

[As a not so side note: I cannot believe it has been a year since Ferguson. (~)
BTW:  having been on somewhat of a successful sabbatical(correction: hi8us), there is a gap in my coverage as well as my social net.]

(^) not to be technical, but not sure of the grade
(BLM: budgets literally me~de~8!)

CPA or DBA

The Uber-Kents?

Now this is hyperbolically preemptive or supremely not fully read...but one of them might be...
and I may have already fare[!] and balanced the rhetoric, but in Nietzschean fashion be the Uber-Kent.  Or hyper-nuanced mild-mannered American Reporters for the daily schlub.


Now fully read, it was much ado about just that.



[When one presumes, one may pre-S out of U or me.]
( Take Back the American Dream )
(b.s.): Poetic Justice , Geometry of Purpose [~]
[BTW~pre~schlub...]

The Forth Way

To pun on the third way and forgo the geometricks[!] 


It was about the political spectrum and aiming for the middle.  One could take the left and the right and go for the middle.  My point was that the answers are not necessarily an amalgam or in the middle.  Though there may be the Trump Beck Rapport ala the Overton Window?*



However, vis a vis 4going the numbers, I simply file these:
Center for American Progress
Our Future**






*TBA or DBA (The Platonic Frame)
** aka TPF (The Peripheral File)^






^ email updates (or Curds and Wey?)

Footnotes Page June 2015 Page One

6-3-15: C 'n A ?  X, Y, Z ~ V ? More's the Pity in the geometrics of values.
Subsetting of Tetrahedron = 6 edges ~ 6 functions of trigonometry

6-16-15 Pardon the leap. (FP2)

Pataki/O'Malley

Andrea Mitchell
Chuck Todd: Which one would have been the 2008 candidate? 
The Overton Window is left open?
Rand Paul independent?
Bernie/Dean strategy?

LeRoy's Lemma

Cube Root of Plato?**

1. Cube
2. Root [ow]
3. of  ***

[ ! ]  [!]

(~) p.27 $13 ii. *

* 5-26-15

(links inserted footnotes continued) NFRY
"This in fact is true of plane figures in geometry; but some spherical figures exhibit, notwithstanding a complete internal agreement, such a contrast in their external relation, that the one figure cannot possibly be put in the place of the other."

This segment is the tangent to the ying/yang/Jung of TOW.
** links inserted
*** associated/related words added.
Math pun of sorts:  cube root of 27 is 3.
[ OW ] :  Steven Clemons: On Olbermann [difficulties]

 

Tolerance (,^) Thugs(...).

...and the two-way street [!] ?

A. (Salon)
SPOILER ALERT( Provocative Lede-In Here) It really confounded me when Governor Mike Pence defended the two-way street of tolerance. I don’t think it is really, but now I wonder if “thug” may be of the same confoundation(sic). It may explain things if you read this, one hopes.

B. (Youtube)
Segregated Zone(Only the tolerant are advised to enter. RATED: Undeleted nor bleeped.)

C.D. Fb
E. Contrary Brin

[...]
N F R Y
[Pre-QCON? Wack a mole *ideology* of immoderation?  ManyKeyKneeZ'an?  Kaufmann/FukuYama? Popper Straussian ?]

* two ends against the Garden or Candide?

(^) comma inserted [tangents, taxes or Texas?] 
(and belated addendums @F^uk^u^Yama)

(5-8-15)

Obtuse Hardball

Is Chris Matthews being provocatively obtuse or is he being naively journalistic as the Devil's Advocate?

Rand  Paul?

Irony  ! [<-one insert 5-10-15 ... ]
context principle  [- ! -] dot dot dot?

retro face ~ PC [^] ?

M-bed Google?

Fed~Upism?

Knit One?
(a. FP4 (2-20-15) FP$, b.Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One), c. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, d. Shilling / Schiller, e. Try Angle Nation )
Pear Type-Oh? Re:nacre
(a. Knit one , b. or ?, c. Going through Hegel or..., d. Crooked Timber, e. 'n?, f. Gatekeeper on a High Horse?, g. Remember Pearl Harbor! )

Ctlr F: type-O.(...) [!]
Irony within Onion ? [!]
Misplaced support ? (...)
(a. QCON and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT, b. Under the Table?, c.The day of the Elephant?, d. Leveling the World Stage?, e. For Careful Processing:, f. There was the 3 AM call..., g. And Bailout..., h. GOLEFT TV  ...?)

(un-Mbedded consequences? 4Lab-L's)

4-14-15
(fp?) mobius :A. THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C. Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .